WebbRam Ghulam v. Government of U.P., AIR 1950 All 206 - Referred By Virendra Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 1954 SC 447 - Referred By. Rup Ram v. Punjab State, AIR 1961 Punj 336 - Referred By Mohammad Murad Ibrahim Khan v. Govt. of U.P., (S) AIR 1956 All 75 - Referred By. Advocates Appeared: WebbNMIMS KIRIT P MEHTA . ... Clause (1) of Article 300 of the Indian Constitution states that the government of India can sue or be sued in the name of the union of India and the government of the state. Since the administration's liability today is in direct succession to that of the East India Company, ...
Listen To The New Pashto Songs Of All Time - issuu.com
WebbAnanya Khanna, Case Analysis Of AV Mohan Rao v Kishan Rao, 2 Academike 9... Jump to. Sections of this page. Accessibility Help. Press alt + / to open this menu. Facebook. … WebbGovernment, and one of the objectives is to establish a Socialistic State with its varied industrial and other activities, employing a large army of servants, there is no justification, in principle, or in public interest, that the State should not be held liable vicariously for tortious acts of its servant. tijuana zeta
Ram Gulam And Anr. vs Government Of U.P. on 22 August, 1949
Webbimplied. In the case of Ram Ghulam v Government of U.P.4, the action got dismissed by the Allahabad High Court on the grounds that the commodities were not in their possession … Webbmodified its view expressed in State of Rajasthan v. Mst. Vidhyawati 2 regarding the vicarious liability of government for the tortious acts of its servants. The Uttar Pradesh … Webb2 aug. 2024 · Ram Gulam v. Govt, of U.P. AIR 1950 AII 206. L.M. Co-Operative Bank v. Prabhudas Hathibhai AIR 1966 Bom 134. State of Gujarat v. Memon Mahomed 1967 AIR … tijuana zip code map